Thanks for your response. Your patch works well. Robert Watson (rwatson_at_freebsd.org) wrote: > It looks like there's a missing call to ACCEPT_LOCK() in > uipc_socket.c:soabort(). It should appear before the call to SOCK_LOCK(). > Could you try the attached patch? > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects > robert_at_fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research > > Index: uipc_socket.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c,v > retrieving revision 1.215 > diff -u -r1.215 uipc_socket.c > --- uipc_socket.c 23 Oct 2004 19:06:43 -0000 1.215 > +++ uipc_socket.c 2 Nov 2004 16:57:58 -0000 > _at__at_ -490,6 +490,7 _at__at_ > > error = (*so->so_proto->pr_usrreqs->pru_abort)(so); > if (error) { > + ACCEPT_LOCK(); > SOCK_LOCK(so); > sotryfree(so); /* note: does not decrement the ref count */ > return error; with best regards, -dikshie-Received on Wed Nov 03 2004 - 05:35:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC