On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:36:14AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Tuesday 02 November 2004 17:48, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Don't know, perhaps they don't care about the fraction of ports that > > don't work properly since the rest of them have such eleet > > optimization. > > On the technical end of things, what exactly is it that causes problems with > higher-level optimizations? Are they due to bugs in GCC, or obfuscated > code that can be interpreted several ways? Sometimes GCC bugs, but also incorrect C code in a lot of cases (that's how I came up with the number of 350 ports; those are the ports that emit a certain warning about probable bugs when compiled with -O2). Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC