On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:39:44PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > No. This is strictly an issue of seeding gcc's random number generator > during the compile... the binary produced with this flag has a 1 in 2^32 > chance of being produced randomly at present. (Or maybe 1 in 2^64 on > applicable systems, I can't remember.) I like this idea. Binary upgrade snapshots for sizable things like base system C++ compilers considered good. Thanks again to kan_at_ for fixing c++filt and helping my team at work, btw. BMSReceived on Wed Nov 10 2004 - 01:28:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:21 UTC