Re: [releng_5 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy_at_optushome.com.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:01:40 +1100

Given that RELENG_5 is now -STABLE, shouldn't this be going to
stable_at_ instead of current_at_?
-- 
Peter Jeremy

Received on Thu Nov 11 2004 - 06:01:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha"
Previous message: John Hay: "Re: net80211+atheros changes (updated)"
In reply to: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:21 UTC