In message <20041111163638.GA700_at_laptop.6bone.nl>, Mark Santcroos writes: >On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:25:23AM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: >> It has been reported that both amd64 and i386 architectures will panic >> in natd by jumping to address 0. There has been no discussion since the >> reports, however, and I was wondering if anyone is looking into it. > >This should fix it. We have a problem if that is the case, because then ipdivert doesn't run through net_init_domain() :-( > >--- sys/netinet/ip_divert.c Mon Nov 8 15:44:53 2004 >+++ sys/netinet/ip_divert.c Thu Nov 11 17:24:07 2004 >_at__at_ -671,6 +671,9 _at__at_ > .pru_send = div_send, > .pru_shutdown = div_shutdown, > .pru_sockaddr = div_sockaddr, >+ .pru_sosend = sosend, >+ .pru_soreceive = soreceive, >+ .pru_sopoll = sopoll, > .pru_sosetlabel in_pcbsosetlabel > }; > >-- >RIPE NCC - Delft University of Technology - The FreeBSD Project >marks_at_ripe.net - m.a.santcroos_at_ewi.tudelft.nl - marks_at_freebsd.org >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Thu Nov 11 2004 - 15:40:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:21 UTC