Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <4195D903.2090801_at_DeepCore.dk>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= wri > tes: > >>Zoltan Frombach wrote: >> >>>This is still an issue for me. Please read this post of mine: >>>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2004-November/009420.html >>> >>>Can anyone help? I would gladely install test patches to track this >>>problem down. My system is 5.3-R. And the WRITE_DMA warning happens at >>>least twice a day, it is so predictable. With thanks, >> >>Hmmm, that warning is issued from ATA when requests has been returned to >>the systems bio_taskqueue but the system hasn't finished them within the >>timeout. Now this is an indication of the system being unresponsive >>already at that point, or at least that was the idea. >>It has nothing to do with a bad drive, since the interrupt was seen the >>drive has finished the request it was asked, its the layers above ATA >>that doesn't respond to the request beeing returned as finished. > > It is not really the task of the ata driver to fail requests at that > time. How long is the timeout anyway ? Oh, ATA doesn't fail them, it just yells that the request hasn't been finished yet by the upper layers, it doesn't do anything to the request. Timeout is 5 secs, which is a pretty long time in this context IMHO.. However, if it can take that long time to get data pushed up the chain, it might also explain some of the reduced I/O performance reported ? -- -SørenReceived on Sat Nov 13 2004 - 09:01:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC