Re: [HEADSUP] vnode bypass for devices: "ON"

From: Wilkinson, Alex <alex.wilkinson_at_dsto.defence.gov.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:41:46 +1030

Do u mind explaining what this actually means ? 

I'm "assuming" we are now by-passing the vnode layer for performance reasons ?

 - aW

	0n Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:14:03PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: 
	
	Vnode bypass is now ON by default in -current.

Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 23:17:18 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wilkinson, Alex: "Re: dealing with interupt storms ....."
Previous message: Martin Blapp: "Re: Deadlock problems with 'kill PID' on CURRENT"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "[HEADSUP] vnode bypass for devices: "ON""
Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: [HEADSUP] vnode bypass for devices: "ON""

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC