Re: 6-CURRENT unbelievably slow?

From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus_at_marcuscom.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 02:39:52 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Baldwin wrote:
| On Thursday 11 November 2004 05:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
|>On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Alexander_at_Leidinger.net wrote:
|>
|>>Zitat von Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus_at_freebsd.org>:
|>>
|>>>I noticed the interrupt storm detection line in dmesg.  In previous
|>>>builds, this worked, but it doesn't seem to be taking effect anymore.
|>>
|>>AFAIK the interrupt storm detection was removed (at least partially).
|>
|>s/removed/fixed so it doesn't give so many false positives/
|>
|>(at least partially) ;-)
|>
|>Talk to jhb..
|
|
| Please try this patch out and let me know if it does any better:

Yes, this patch makes a world of difference.  The interrupt storm is
still there, but the ata0 (irq 14) rate is down to 1480 per second, and
the interrupt load is only ~2%.  Thanks.

Joe

- --
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBma7Ib2iPiv4Uz4cRAkYEAKCTgjJvkRbvbtYndCuYb3rMWTUyPACdFlZV
CJFFhxLxnTVVawIr6gjqohw=
=z8iV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 06:39:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC