On 2004-11-19 09:17, Philip Paeps <philip_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2004-11-18 18:43:56 (+0200), Giorgos Keramidas <keramida_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > The screen-4.0.2 version that misc/screen installs is apparently the latest > > version of screen available. It also contains a zillion bugs, is written in > > a very insecure style, it uses an antiquated version of autoconf script, > > etc. > > Unrelated, perhaps, but has anyone else noticed that on sparc64, the date > stuck in utmp seems to always be '19700101': I'll have a look later today and this weekend to the utmp handling of screen. It may be just a bug that shows up on 64-bit architectures. > | (philip_at_wotan)~% w > | 9:16am up 7 days, 7:52, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01 > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN_at_ IDLE WHAT > | philip p1 loge:S.0 01Jan70 - w > > I've not seen this happen on any other platforms... Does anyone on amd64 use screen to see if this happens there too?Received on Fri Nov 19 2004 - 07:51:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:22 UTC