Re: Protection from the dreaded "rm -fr /"

From: Mark Dixon <mark_at_markdnet.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:38:34 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2 Oct 2004, at 09:34, Michael Reifenberger wrote:

> This does only help for the obvious case of '/' but not for the
> './' and '../' or '../../' ... accidents.
>
> Furthermore does it prevent root from doing `rm -rf /` which is a 
> pretty
> legal operation for root since he knows what he is doing.
>
> This is UNIX, not Windows.
>

I agree, this is not a route we want to go down. root should be able to 
do whatever they want, no questions asked. If you put in protections to 
prevent root doing 'silly' things, it will simply encourage admins to 
be root when they probably shouldn't

Mark


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBX9ayLqgJ90OcaiARAu0pAKDv9Hc6bQl9xi8N5OOXIaG3o6zzjgCfeC3G
60/slkjUAZ1+bALuUVT0GJQ=
=LCcS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sun Oct 03 2004 - 08:44:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:15 UTC