csh is root's shell?

From: Jason C. Wells <jcw_at_highperformance.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:16:03 -0700

Is csh really supposed to be root's shell by default?  I suddenly wonder if 
it has been that way for the past eight years and I only now noticed.  I 
can feel my mind slipping...

Later,
Jason C. Wells

Received on Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:16:04 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Wolfskill: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Previous message: Doug Barton: "Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default"
Next in thread: David Wolfskill: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Reply: David Wolfskill: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Reply: Erik Trulsson: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: Nikolay Kalev: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: Rusty Nejdl: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: Nikolay Kalev: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: Nikolay Kalev: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: Ian FREISLICH: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: sthaug_at_nethelp.no: "Re: csh is root's shell?"
Maybe reply: Jose M Rodriguez: "Re: csh is root's shell?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:15 UTC