On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:34:15AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:08:03PM +0100, Chris Elsworth wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Is this likely to be filesystem corruption in a really bad way, or a > > ufs bug: > > > > # /sbin/dump -0 -LuaC32 -f /backup/root.dump / > > mksnap_ffs: Cannot create //.snap/dump_snapshot: Input/output error > > > > # fsck_ufs /dev/mirror/gma > > ** /dev/mirror/gma (NO WRITE) > > ** Last Mounted on / > > ** Root file system > > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > > fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 4294967292 bytes for inoinfo > > Why can't it write to the device? Is it mounted read-write? Drop it > to read-only and retry. Vice versa for the root filesystem; is it > mounted read-only? Ah, sorry, should have said - yes, the filesystem was mounted read-write (/dev/mirror/gma and / are the same thing), but it does the same thing in read-only: # init 1 .. # umount -a # mount -o ro / # mount /dev/mirror/gma on / (ufs, local, read-only) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) # fsck -y / ** /dev/mirror/gma ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 4294967292 bytes for inoinfo Surely fsck doesn't really need 4GB of physical mem? There is 1GB of physical and 4GB of swap configured in this. -- ChrisReceived on Thu Oct 07 2004 - 14:55:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:16 UTC