Scott Long wrote: > |------------------+-------------+----------------+----------------------| > | | | | Apple's Darwin | > | | | | operating system has | > | | | | fairly extensive | > | Merge of Darwin | | | improvements to | > | msdosfs, other | Not done | -- | msdosfs and other | > | fixes | | | kernel services; | > | | | | these fixes must be | > | | | | reviewed and merged | > | | | | to the FreeBSD tree. | > |------------------+-------------+----------------+----------------------| I believe this is done. I looked into this before 5.2 and saw that the main difference was support for the dirty bit. trhodes_at_ merged those changes and bde_at_ did some cleanup. At this point, I don't think there's a major msdosfs diff between the two. As for the other stuff, sure, it's great to keep trying to merge stuff from Darwin (and NetBSD, and OpenBSD, and DFBSD, ...) but I don't think that kind of general wish should be a TODO. -NateReceived on Fri Oct 15 2004 - 13:59:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:17 UTC