On 15 Oct, David Schultz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> N of blocks can be different. >> Can't provide full debugging trace yet, excepting this one: > > The traceback won't be very helpful in this case because this most > likely indicates a swap leak that happened some time earlier. > What *would* be helpful is more information about your swap > devices, any steps you need to take while the system is running to > reproduce this, the approximate size of N, etc. I think a mounted filesystem on a swap-backed md device is likely to cause this problem.Received on Fri Oct 15 2004 - 19:43:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:17 UTC