Re: Stable panic on shutdown: swapoff: failed to locate N swap blocks

From: Andrey Chernov <ache_at_nagual.pp.ru>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 06:48:41 +0400
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:39:34PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> FWIW, I think that doing a swapoff in the shutdown path is just asking
> for trouble.  Fixing whatever bug this is would of course be nice, but
> the need for swapoff here is a hack and only opens up up to problems.

I agree. It looks like sort of race happens. Application (cvsupd) can be 
killed, but its inodes activity delayed by softupdates a bit more (just 
raw guess). I see no useful purpose to call swapoff(8) at shutdown stage, 
correct me, if I am not right.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/
Received on Sat Oct 16 2004 - 00:48:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:17 UTC