Re: WITNESS bug

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:01:23 -0700
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 09:13:26AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> 
> Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes:
> 
> >  You should never not run with WITNESS_SKIPSPIN if you use
> >  modules.  Any spin mutexes not listed statically in the witness
> >  code will cause your machine to immediately panic.
> 
> 	If this is true (and I'm not disputing it), shouldn't it be
> noted in GENERIC and/or NOTES?  For that matter, what's the penalty
> for not automatically including it as part of WITNESS?

Sometimes you don't want to use it, e.g. if you actually want to trace
spinlock operations with witness.

Kris

Received on Tue Oct 19 2004 - 14:01:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC