Mike Jakubik wrote: >Julian Elischer said: > > >>Mike Jakubik wrote: >> >> >>>Out of curiosity, i ran this on one of our production servers, which runs >>>on a dual Xeon MB, with SCSI raid-10 setup, and to my surprise here are >>>the results: >>> >>>CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2799.22-MHz 686-class CPU) >>>real memory = 2146959360 (2047 MB) >>>avail memory = 2099650560 (2002 MB) >>>FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs >>> >>>da0 at asr0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 >>>da0: <ADAPTEC RAID-10 3B0A> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device >>> >>>FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 #0: Sun Sep 12 13:09:43 EDT 2004 >>> >>>(Custom kernel, no debugging) >>> >>># dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=200 >>>200+0 records in >>>200+0 records out >>>209715200 bytes transferred in 6.225309 secs (33687517 bytes/sec) >>> >>>Why is a SCSI raid-10 system slower than a plain IDE disk? Something is >>>wrong here. >>> >>> >>> >>I BELIEVE (without empirical proof) that the new scheme of running IO >>through the geom threads >>requires a higher degree of smartness from the scheduler than before, >>where IO was done either by interrupt >>or by the calling (already running) thread. >> >>Make sure you have preemption enabled, and make sure that HTT is turned >>off. (HTT is a DOG that slows down >>almost everything except processes that have a lot of FP work). >> >> > >I do not use GEOM, all GEOM related stuff is is disabled from the kernel. >HTT is disabled in the bios already. Im using SCHED_4BSD, no prememtion >however. I will update this box to a more recent releng_5 soon, and try >again. Still, this seems pretty bad for server class hardware. > How do you disable GEOM? I believe it is no longer optional. Everythi g runs through geom. you may however be not installing some modules.. > > >Received on Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:12:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC