On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote: > Chris Hedley wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote: >> >>> Are you using PREEMPT with SHED_ULE? Or is this just SHED_ULE without >>> preemption? >> >> I have both SCHED_ULE and PREEMPTION set in my config file, which I've >> included as an attachment "just in case" (please don't laugh at how scruffy >> it's become!) > > Err, my fault for not looking at it. I would disable PREEMPT if you're going > to use SCHED_ULE. It's known to be pretty unstable. If you want preemption > I'd switch to SCHED_4BSD. For the life of me I can't recall why I turned on PREEMPTION; I doubt if it was just "it seemed like a good idea at the time", but I'll turn it off again anyway and give it another go! Chris.Received on Wed Oct 20 2004 - 01:32:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC