Xin LI wrote: > ReiserFS, however, *does* provide better performance when dealing with zillions > of small files. I don't want to debate whether a well-designed system should > actually utilize this, but I believe it would be beneficial to bring some > different ideas we can take as reference :-) > > My intention is, however, to write a new (or to improve our existing) > filesystem which is optimized for large files (e.g. databases), while > providing "fairly good" performance when dealing with many small files. I agree this could benefit to our filesystem. The user could also have the choice between a few solutions. -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron http://www.dumbbell-fr.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC