In message: <20041020154026.GA40554_at_freebie.xs4all.nl> Wilko Bulte <wb_at_freebie.xs4all.nl> writes: : On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote.. : > In message: <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d_at_mail.gmail.com> : > jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator_at_gmail.com> writes: : > : What are the performance implications of a debug kernel? : > : : > : Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down : > : to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for : > : sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any : > : significant performance hits.. : > : > So long as it can be turned off, I don't care too much. : > : > However, I'm going going to take exception that it isn't a disk space : : Sure.. and we have plenty of Viagra spam to prove it ;-) : : > starting to fill up. In addition, we sometimes deploy new kernels to : > the field and 16MB takes a lot longer to upload than 3MB (think really : > bad connectivity to many of the remote locations our systems may be : > deployed in). : : But I assume you would run a customised kernel on these machines anyway? Yes. Please see the first sentence of my reply: : > So long as it can be turned off, I don't care too much. Size does matter, so I have to be able to turn this feature off. WarnerReceived on Wed Oct 20 2004 - 14:53:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC