On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:33:23PM -0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: > > Recently I was running a number of tests against 5.3-STABLE (btw, > RELENG_5 labeling the system as 5.3-STABLE might be very confusing in a > situation where there's not even a 5.3-RELEASE yet, if one doesnt follow > how -STABLE are treated compared to "security branchs"), in a SMP system > with multiple SATA RAID, and it was not responding well, had a number of > freezes under stress tests; Some of those problems could be minimized > running BSD as the scheduller instead of ULE; > > Now -RC1 shows the same performance 5.2.1 used to, also w/ SCHED_BSD, > but with ULE it stops responding well sometimes. Don't use ULE! It has known problems! Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:18 UTC