On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:26:41 -0600 Scott Long <scottl_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > A lot of poeple have noted recently that a lot of bug reports are > coming in with strange symptoms, and only after a lot of detective > work does it turn out that the submitter is using the ULE scheduler. What are the short term plans for ULE? I understand turning it off for RELENG_5, so I take it will be tested in HEAD? ULE has many nice features and it would be a shame that it wasn't tested well enough so that bugs can eventually be fixed. > out and not compile at all for RELENG_5 and RELENG_5_3. The time > spent debugging ULE-induced problems is causing way too much lost > time, and we need to focus on debugging the supported configurations, > not the unsupported ones. But it has to be tested at some point in time, else it will be in limbo state for ever. Maybe a note in UPDATING explainning the situation would be convenient so people willing to devote time to test and help fix ULE can do so. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez <flynn_at_energyhq.es.eu.org> http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 Note: All HTML mail goes to /dev/null
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC