Hello Scott, Scott Long wrote: >> no, it is my home PC in which I work so it's important stability >> (not overclocking) and disk redundancy (vinum, gmirror) > > > No, I think that he is saying that the ATA silicon is marginal and > probably overclocked by the vendor, not that you have overclocked your > CPU. ok, it was a bad interpretation. >> Also, there is an unresolvable question. Why two 52MB/s disks >> in raid0 has a throughput of 40MB/s and for raid1 18MB/s?? > > > Would you _PLEASE_ stop trying to associate RAID with performance! > RAID is about reliability and reduncdancy, not about speed. Some > cases can give you desirable performance increases as a side effect, > but that is not the primary goal. Specifically in this case, the > GEOM raid classes are fairly new and have not had the benefit of > years of testing. I'd much rather that the focus be on stability > and reliability for them, not speed. Once the primary goals of > RAID are satisfied then we can start looking at performance. The whole story is run a raid 10 configuration, so I have the best of both words, redundancy with gmirror and speed with gstripe. I don't see why it couldn't be that way and because this RAID0 performance is important in my case.Received on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 13:39:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC