Re: HEADS UP: ULE off in 5.3

From: Miguel Mendez <flynn_at_energyhq.es.eu.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:02:52 +0200
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:45:08 -0700
Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> wrote:

> >What are the short term plans for ULE? I understand turning it off
> >for RELENG_5, so I take it will be tested in HEAD? ULE has many nice
> >features and it would be a shame that it wasn't tested well enough so
> >that bugs can eventually be fixed.
> >
> 
> the plan is that Someone (maybe you?) fixes it..
> jeffr seems to have had collision with Real Life (TM) which is using
> all his spare time.

I see, thanks. Some time ago I read Jeff's paper and barely looked at
some parts of the code, but IMHO it's too big a task for a single
person. OTOH, now that Matthew Seaman has released his portindex
replacement (which means mine can wait indefinitely) I might give this a
go, $REAL_JOB workload notwithstanding.

Cheers,
-- 
	Miguel Mendez <flynn_at_energyhq.es.eu.org>
	http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org
	PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1
	Note: All HTML mail goes to /dev/null

Received on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:01:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC