On Friday, 29. October 2004 17:51, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:11 AM 29/10/2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >Well, if we would take stability and general usefulness (even more so in > >comparison to other USB implementations in mind) as the reference point, > > we would need to disable most of USB. I think enabling ehci in GENERIC > > would be a good idea, especially since there's no loadable module... > > On my Intel 865 box, its pretty easy for me to lock the system up with 2 > different types of USB key drives (Lexar and SANDISK). The system also > sporadically locks up at boot time, if I have a Keyspan USB-Serial device > plugged in using EHCI. For new users, I think its more important that the > system works. There are similar issues all over USB in FreeBSD, that's not a good rationale to leave ehci out of GENERIC. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi_at_freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC