Michael Nottebrock wrote: >On Friday, 29. October 2004 20:29, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >>I think EHCI would only make it worse. >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>The same 1.1 bugs would be there >>that you mention, and then the ones added by EHCI. i.e. it doesnt take any >>1.1 bugs away, just adds more. >> >> > >Exactly. And I still say it should go in. And you should file a PR about your >ehci issues (oh, yeah, and we need USB maintainers to take them, too :(). > I have been taking a sebatical from freeBSD after puting my marriage a bit too close to the line than I like.. :-) but one of my next things to look at is teh USB code.. I've already been in there a bit and will be getting in again with a few others who have shown interest as soon as: 1/ I've spent enough time at home with the kids/wife to keep that side balanced.. 2/ work settles down 3/ the 5.3 push is over. We have about 6 people who have shown interest in USB and we should be starting up a mailing list soon (who's doing that?) which should help. In addition we need expertise in newbus, CAM/SIM to help us get those sides of things in order. It needs more than a small touchup.. > > >Received on Fri Oct 29 2004 - 19:12:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC