Re: 5.3-RC1 poor ATA perfomance

From: Alexander S. Usov <A.S.Usov_at_KVI.nl>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:00:36 +0200

Hi!

So I have finally managed to repeat this simple(stupid) test with
PREEMTION, and this difference is still there.

I agree that this kind of testing is almost useless, but somehow I
find it hard to believe that a 30% loss in raw write rate will be
invisible in a different situations.

-- 
Best regards,
  Alexander.

Received on Sat Oct 30 2004 - 20:01:05 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ryan Sommers: "Re: host_mem_start value negative?"
Previous message: Russell Jackson: "host_mem_start value negative?"
In reply to: Willem Jan Withagen: "Re: 5.3-RC1 poor ATA perfomance"
Next in thread: Kevin Oberman: "Re: 5.3-RC1 poor ATA perfomance"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC