On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > The problem is some how that the knote is being removed from the list > > > (or was never on the list), but not being marked detached... > > > > > > Hmmm. what are the options you are using for rfork? > > > > The worker process starts two worker threads created by > > rfork(RFPROC|RFTHREAD|RFMEM). Each thread opens kqueue and > > adds the EVFILT_SIGNAL event. > > > > If you like I can send to you the source tarball (I do not distribute > > the server right now, because it has not the documentation). The build > > process is simple. Then you need to press ^C and you will get the panic. > > I believe this panic may be possible w/o rfork, but I'm not possitive.. > It's probably an artifact of the fact that the kq was living longer > than the proc that had the signal kevent associated with it, which > normally does not happen... > > Attached is a patch.. And let me know if it fixes your panic... The patch fixed the panic (I tested on 5.3-BETA2, GENERIC, SMP, HTT, SCHED_ULE). Thank you. Could you make the similar patch for 4.x ? And one more, could you rename http://people.freebsd.org/~jmg/kqueue.man.html into kqueue_preliminary.man.html and place a modern (or at least from 4.1-RELEASE) kqueue man page in kqueue.man.html ? Google shows your man page at first position and it confuses people. I saw several times when people said that kqueue has the incompatible interface between BSDs and even between various FreeBSD verisons referring to this man page. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/Received on Wed Sep 01 2004 - 17:04:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:10 UTC