On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Robert Watson wrote: >> exclusive sleep mutex rip r=1 (0xc079e70c) locked _at_ /usr/src53/sys/netinet6/raw_ip.c:255 > > Ah, indeed, there's an incorrect "lock" instead of "unlock" there. Could > you try the attached patch: Thanks. Your patch works like a dream. I looked a that line a dozen times and didn't realize it was a lock instead of an unlock ;-) I was just wondering why you're using the same lock in IPv4 and IPv6 and if this probably may cause problems in ipv6 over ipv4 situations. Tested on RELENG_5 -Patrick > > Index: raw_ip6.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /data/fbsd-cvs/ncvs/src/sys/netinet6/raw_ip6.c,v > retrieving revision 1.45 > diff -u -r1.45 raw_ip6.c > --- raw_ip6.c 12 Aug 2004 18:31:36 -0000 1.45 > +++ raw_ip6.c 2 Sep 2004 12:55:19 -0000 > _at__at_ -252,7 +252,7 _at__at_ > } > ip6stat.ip6s_delivered--; > } > - INP_INFO_RLOCK(&ripcbinfo); > + INP_INFO_RUNLOCK(&ripcbinfo); > return IPPROTO_DONE; > } -- Patrick Guélat, ImproWare AG Network Services, CH-4133 Pratteln Mail: Patrick.Guelat_at_imp.ch - Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 (ext: 13)Received on Thu Sep 02 2004 - 17:23:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:10 UTC