Re: vnode leak in FFS code ... ?

From: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy_at_hub.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 00:49:05 -0300 (ADT)
Just as a followup to this ... the server crashed on Thursday night around 
22:00ADT, only just came back up after a very long fsck ... with all 62 
VMs started up, and 1008 processes running, vnodes currently look like:

Sep  4 00:43:00 venus root: debug.numvnodes: 58370 - debug.freevnodes: 824 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 0 - vlruwt
Sep  4 00:44:00 venus root: debug.numvnodes: 58370 - debug.freevnodes: 782 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 0 - vlruwt
Sep  4 00:45:01 venus root: debug.numvnodes: 58370 - debug.freevnodes: 977 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 0 - vlruwt
Sep  4 00:46:00 venus root: debug.numvnodes: 58370 - debug.freevnodes: 582 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 0 - vlruwt
venus# ps aux | wc -l
     1008
venus#

about a tenth of what they were when the server crashed :(



On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Allan Fields wrote:
>
>>> It's really hard to tell if there is a vnode leak here.  The vnode pool
>>> is fairly fluid and has nothing to do with the number of files that are
>>> actually 'open'.  Vnodes get created when the VFS layer wants to access
>>> an object that isn't already in the cache, and only get destroyed when
>>> the object is destroyed.  A vnode that reprents a file that was opened
>>> will stay 'active' in the system long after the file has been closed,
>>> because it's cheaper to keep it active in the cache than it is to
>>> discard it and then risk having to go through the pain of a namei()
>>> and VOP_LOOKUP() again later.  Only if the maxvnode limit is hit will
>>> old vnodes start getting recycled to represent other objects.  [...]
>>> 
>>> So you've obviously bumped up kern.maxvnodes well above the limits that
>>> are normally generated from the auto-tuner.  Why did you do that, if not
>>> because you knew that you'd have a large working set of referenced (but
>>> maybe not open all at once) filesystem objects?  [...]
>> 
>> There was a pevious thread I've found which also helps explains
>> this further:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2003-May/001266.html
>> 
>> Really the same issue now as then?
>
> I'm not getting the hangs now, it is freeing up vnodes ... but its having to 
> work very hard to do so, or so it seems:
>
> venus# ps aux | grep vnlru
> root        7  3.0  0.0     0    0  ??  DL    5Aug04 606:34.54  (vnlru)
>
> I started up the script for monitoring this on Aug 29th ... since then, there 
> have been 4331 entries to the log file, of which  1927 are in 'vlrup', which 
> I believe is vnlru running through its lists trying to find some to free up, 
> if I recall the code ... ?
>
> venus# grep vnode /var/log/syswatch | wc -l
>    4331
> venus# grep vnode /var/log/syswatch | grep vlrup | wc -l
>    1927
>
> and this is based on a check every minute ...
>
> The other server, running ~19 more VMs (~100 more processes), only up 2 days 
> now, seems to be fairing better:
>
> debug.numvnodes: 344062 - debug.freevnodes: 168285 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 0 - 
> vlruwt
>
> I've schedualed 'maintenance' on that server for Saturday ... am going to 
> shut down all 'non-host server' processes, and unmount the large file system 
> (where all the VMs run off of) ... see if that cleans up any of the vnodes 
> without having to do a reboot ...
>
> If that doesn't work, I could cause a panic and have it dump core, if that 
> would provide for easier/better debugging ... ?
>
> I have limited flexibility with the server, but it is a 'real' server without 
> a fake load on it, and as solid as I've always considered FreeBSD to be, I 
> seem to have a knack for pushing it and breaking it :( ... so whatever data I 
> can provide to make it that much more solid, even if it involves a little bit 
> of downtime to get a good core dump, I'm willing to do ...
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy_at_hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy_at_hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
Received on Sat Sep 04 2004 - 01:49:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:10 UTC