At 3:41 AM -0700 2004-09-11, Julian Elischer wrote: > I am not sure why this appeared to work on my system. My only thought is that > I wasn't booting off the kernel I thught I was booting off. There was a big > rush to get it in before scott changed the name. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we're in freeze for RELENG_5 preparing for it to become the new -STABLE branch, right? Should not this change have been made only to HEAD, and then merged to RELENG_5 if it was found to be necessary? Assuming that's the case, then why the rush? I'm just curious as to how a mistake like this could have made it into both -HEAD and RELENG_5 simultaneously.... -- Brad Knowles, <brad_at_stop.mail-abuse.org> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.Received on Sat Sep 11 2004 - 13:51:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:11 UTC