Re: page fault in sched_pin()

From: Brad Knowles <brad_at_stop.mail-abuse.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:48:08 +0200
At 3:41 AM -0700 2004-09-11, Julian Elischer wrote:

>  I am not sure why this appeared to work on my system. My only thought is that
>  I wasn't booting off the kernel I thught I was booting off. There was a big
>  rush to get it in before scott changed the name.

	Correct me if I'm wrong, but we're in freeze for RELENG_5 
preparing for it to become the new -STABLE branch, right?  Should not 
this change have been made only to HEAD, and then merged to RELENG_5 
if it was found to be necessary?  Assuming that's the case, then why 
the rush?


	I'm just curious as to how a mistake like this could have made it 
into both -HEAD and RELENG_5 simultaneously....

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad_at_stop.mail-abuse.org>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

     -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
     Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
Received on Sat Sep 11 2004 - 13:51:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:11 UTC