I have had this problem for a very long time. I really haven't found anything I can point my finger at about this, but it seems like there is something wrong with the key generation: A simple thing like kadmin -l kadmin> init MCNEIL.COM would core dump with #11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #12 0x00000002009863ca in krb5_string_to_key_data_salt_opaque ( context=0xc0f02010, enctype=201589254, password= {length = 6, data = 0x408d78}, salt= {salttype = KRB5_PW_SALT, saltvalue = {length = 26, data = 0x50f320}}, opaque={length = 0, data = 0x0}, key=0x7) at /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libkrb5/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/crypto.c:1007 #13 0x0000000200986321 in krb5_string_to_key_data_salt (context=0xcc182000, enctype=-955776509, password={length = 6, data = 0x408d78}, salt= {salttype = KRB5_PW_SALT, saltvalue = {length = 26, data = 0x50f320}}, key=0x7fffffffe858) I've always suspected that I have something old in my system that is causing this. Now I wonder if it isn't openssl from the ports. For some reason, kadmin is linked with libcrypto.so.3 instead of the libcrypto.so in /usr/lib: /usr/bin/kadmin: libkadm5clnt.so.7 => /usr/lib/libkadm5clnt.so.7 (0x200636000) libkadm5srv.so.7 => /usr/lib/libkadm5srv.so.7 (0x20073f000) libhdb.so.7 => /usr/lib/libhdb.so.7 (0x20084d000) libkrb5.so.7 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.7 (0x200960000) libroken.so.7 => /usr/lib/libroken.so.7 (0x200aa9000) libasn1.so.7 => /usr/lib/libasn1.so.7 (0x200bb9000) libcrypto.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x200ce2000) libcrypt.so.2 => /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x200f30000) libcom_err.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x201049000) libreadline.so.4 => /lib/libreadline.so.4 (0x20114b000) libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x201285000) libldap-2.2.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7 (0x2013e0000) liblber-2.2.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/liblber-2.2.so.7 (0x201519000) libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x201628000) libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x20182c000) libssl.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x201944000) Could this be a problem, or is it just in there because sasl is? SeanReceived on Sun Sep 12 2004 - 22:30:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:11 UTC