On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: > Hi. > > Not shure whether this is the right place to ask, but > I haven't found other sources of information. > > I deployed a beta3-nfs-server which works fine. Two > IDE-to-SCSI-cabinets are connected to the server using > an aic7899-controller. The first cabinet has approx. 2 > TB (12 disks at 200 GB, as expected). When I connected > the second cabinet using 250 GB disks, I exptected > approx. 2.5 TB, but only saw 764 GB. > > Is there any limit that is imposed by 5.x in terms of > max. partition size? This is running on a Compaq DL > 380 dual PIII (G2) with 3 GB RAM, microstorage > cabinet. > > The raid-system became visible by the usual > 'camcontrol rescan all' and I used 'fdisk -I /dev/da2' > and 'disklabel -w /dev/da2s1'. The limit on the size of a disk is unreachable, but we have a lack of good partitioning tools at the moment. bsdlabel (the program formerly known as disklabel) is limited to 2TB. Sunlabel appears to be limited to 16TB in 2TB partitions and fdisk is limited to 2TB due to bugs in the program and 4TB due to the actual format. If you don't need to boot off the slice, you may wish to try gpt(8) which should support any disk money can buy, but which we can't currently boot off of GPT partitions. I'm in the process of getting some documentation on this in to the handbook. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:11 UTC