Raphael H. Becker wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:26:20PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >>Raphael H. Becker wrote: >> >>>># sysctl net.inet.tcp >>>># sysctl net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list >>>># netstat -s -p tcp >>>># netstat -s -p ip >>> >>>http://rhb.uugrn.org/FreeBSD/bugs/5.x/1000-to-100/check_before.txt >>>http://rhb.uugrn.org/FreeBSD/bugs/5.x/1000-to-100/check_after.txt >> >>Could you please provide the same information (except the second sysctl one) >>from the target machine as well. You don't have to show the difference > > http://rhb.uugrn.org/FreeBSD/bugs/5.x/1000-to-100/check_target.txt Ok, this give some very stange information: On the taget machine (4.10) we see a huge amount of OO packets arriving: 92920 out-of-order packets (134546620 bytes) but we don't see nearly that many on retransmits on the source machine (5.3): 281 data packets (405792 bytes) retransmitted However the data set on the target machine seem to be skewed. There is a lot of other TCP traffic on there as well. So this probably doesn't really relate directly to the test you did. >>between before and after but try to make sure that not much other traffic >>was going than the test. > > Just my ssh-Session. But I can't guarantee for each packet passing the > router (= the target-machine). There's no "production"-traffic on that > subnet, just my testboxes. Hmmm... Without getting the TCP statictics back to zero it's hard to correlate any data. Would you mind trying a 5.3 to 5.3 transfer but the target 5.3 box forced to only 100Mbit full-duplex? Same statistics again. -- AndreReceived on Fri Sep 17 2004 - 20:17:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:12 UTC