Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 12:06:43PM -0700, Sean McNeil wrote: > >>I've had good luck with the 4BSD scheduler and PREEMPTION on so I >>thought I would try the ULE scheduler. Was up for just a short time >>before I got the following on my amd64 machine: > > > This is a known problem, BTW. > > Kris There is likely a message at the top of the dmesg output that says, "WARNING: Kernel PREEMPTION is unstable under SCHED_ULE." This has been discussed quite a bit recently and we decided that focusing on the 4BSD scheduler gave us a better chance at having a stable system for 5.3. I still welcome anyone to step in and investigate the problems with ULE. ScottReceived on Sat Sep 18 2004 - 20:50:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:12 UTC