On Monday 20 September 2004 02:46 pm, Roman Kurakin wrote: > Hi, > > I have problem with one of my SMP systems (see end of letter). > It looks that following patch: > > Index: mp_machdep.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c,v > retrieving revision 1.238 > diff -u -r1.238 mp_machdep.c > --- mp_machdep.c 1 Sep 2004 06:42:01 -0000 1.238 > +++ mp_machdep.c 20 Sep 2004 18:20:49 -0000 > _at__at_ -747,6 +747,11 _at__at_ > POSTCODE(INSTALL_AP_TRAMP_POST); > > pmap_kenter(boot_address + KERNBASE, boot_address); > +#ifdef I386_CPU > + invltlb(); > +#else > + invlpg((u_int)dst); > +#endif > for (x = 0; x < size; ++x) > *dst++ = *src++; > > solves the problem. I'll check it on not very recent hacked current. > So this is initial request. I'll check it with current current without my > hacks to double check that this works always and inform if this helps. > > The intent of this letter to ask community if this workaround for my > problem or real bug fix. If this is only workaround please let me know > and I'll continue to dig with version I currently use. > (I don't like workarounds) > > Best regards, > Roman Kurakin It's probably cleaner to use pmap_invalidate_range(). Something like: Index: mp_machdep.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c,v retrieving revision 1.238 diff -u -r1.238 mp_machdep.c --- mp_machdep.c 1 Sep 2004 06:42:01 -0000 1.238 +++ mp_machdep.c 20 Sep 2004 20:50:35 -0000 _at__at_ -738,15 +738,19 _at__at_ int x; int size = *(int *) ((u_long) & bootMP_size); u_char *src = (u_char *) ((u_long) bootMP); - u_char *dst = (u_char *) boot_address + KERNBASE; + u_char *dst; u_int boot_base = (u_int) bootMP; u_int8_t *dst8; u_int16_t *dst16; u_int32_t *dst32; + vm_offset_t va; POSTCODE(INSTALL_AP_TRAMP_POST); - pmap_kenter(boot_address + KERNBASE, boot_address); + va = boot_address + KERNBASE; + pmap_kenter(va, boot_address); + pmap_invalidate_range(kernel_pmap, va, va + size); + dst = (u_char *)va; for (x = 0; x < size; ++x) *dst++ = *src++; It seems odd that this is needed though. Does it go away if you use DISABLE_PSE or DISABLE_PGE? -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Mon Sep 20 2004 - 18:53:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:12 UTC