On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 12:51, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Whoa, easy there. I think Mike was just providing some (what may > be considered superfluous/obvious) feedback to the issue at hand; he > honestly stated up front he had no solution, which implies he's not sure > of how to go about fixing the problem at hand. > > I viewed his "criticism" as more positive than negative; I took it to > read "this is something we definitely need to look at and resolve, not > just put on the back-burner." I think the number of people who manage > and maintain the USB stack is, as you ptu it, limited. I don't know > what happened to Nick Hibma (the original maintainer/porter of the USB > stack), but it seems things have changed hands. > > Finally, albeit a bit off-topic: financial contributions don't always > make things happen quicker in the open-source world. Although we have > less "managerial" red-tape to deal with, there are still only 24 hours > in a day, and many of us work full-time jobs. Time is limited, > regardless if there's a donation involved or otherwise. :-) > > Just my $0.02. I'd like to throw in my $0.02 as well. Perhaps if we all did, then there would be plenty of money ;-) Mike says: I don't claim that I have a solution - but I think I have an example that really requires for this to be solved in some way other than "you must unmount the USB device before unplugging". I think it would be great to not have to unmount a device before we unplug it, but even Windows requires you to do this by "ejecting" the device first. I don't see this as a problem. I especially do not see this as a problem with the USB stack. I haven't followed the entire thread, but is this the only remaining complaint/issue/criticism/etc? Cheers, Sean
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC