Re: bin/72138: libc.so.5 isn't installed in a safe way

From: Matthias Andree <ma_at_dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:05:11 +0200
Xin LI <delphij_at_frontfree.net> writes:

> So I personally prefer we have -S for the shared libraries (as Ruslan's
> patch did) - and give our user community the choose of whether to have
> INSTALL=install -S in their make.conf.
>
> What do you think about this?

It is important that a failing "make installworld" doesn't leave a
non-working system behind. I don't care much about temporary files left
over.

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
Received on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 15:05:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC