Re: what is fsck's "slowdown"?

From: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy_at_hub.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:47 -0300 (ADT)
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Don Lewis wrote:

> On 24 Sep, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Just curious as to whether or not this is going to get applied to the
>> source tree ... ?  Just checked my -current, and it isn't there yet, just
>> wanted to see if maybe its been forgotten? :(
>
> There are a couple of tweaks that I want to do.  My plan is to re-post
> the patch to current_at_ for further testing before I commit it.  After it
> has had time to be sufficiently exercised in -CURRENT, I'll MFC it to
> RELENG_5 (after 5.3-RELEASE), and RELENG_4.  The feedback I've gotten
> from those who reviewed the patch has been positive, but I want to take
> it slow because of the critical nature of fsck.

Cool to both points ... especially the MFC back to 4 :)  Once its there, 
I'll definitely do an upgrade on our servers, since that will 
significantly reduce our downtimes :(

Thanks ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy_at_hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
Received on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 16:27:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC