Re[2]: High rate traffic silence an em interface.

From: Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino_at_fornext.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:24:57 +0900
> This might be my fault! Just committed a fix from Mike Makonnen, that might 
> solve the problem you are seeing. 

 Yes, the problem is solved. Thank you!!!

 BTW, I noticed that netstat -m shows odd informations after that
 netrate test at BETA5. It seems that memory leak or unnecessary freeing
 occur.
> # netstat -m
> 4294950224 mbufs in use
> 10436/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max)
> 0/3/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
> 16604 KBytes allocated to network
> 0 requests for sfbufs denied
> 0 requests for sfbufs delayed
> 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines

 But, a combination of BETA5 kernel and sys/dev/em/* of -current does
 not have this problem.

-- 
Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino_at_fornext.org>
Received on Thu Sep 30 2004 - 07:25:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:14 UTC