Re: request: libedit sync

From: Phil Oleson <oz_at_nixil.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:00:30 -0700
Matthew N. Dodd wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Phil Oleson wrote:
>
>> btw, I was a bit unsure if I should increment 'SHLIB_MAJOR' to 5. 
>> There were some small changes (exposed some tok_xx functions) but it 
>> also removed el_data_get() & el_data_set().  blah..
>
>
> el_data_{get,set}() were local changes.  It would be really nice if 
> they stayed.
>
hmm.. that was a detail I overlooked.  I have not been able to track 
down where these
functions are used. Can you assist with that?   These calls could be 
changed to use
el_get(el, EL_CLIENTDATA, data) && el_set(el, EL_CLIENTDATA, data), and 
we could
eliminate these non-portable local changes.

    Phil
Received on Fri Apr 01 2005 - 21:01:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC