Divacky Roman wrote: > additinoal info (hand rewritten from verbose dmesg): > atamkIII: > ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat=50 ostat1=50 > ata0: stat0=0x90 err=0x90 lsb=0x90 msb=0x90 > ata0: stat0=0x90 err=0x90 lsb=0x90 msb=0x90 > ata0: stat0=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 > ata0: stat1=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb > ata0: reset tp2 stat=50 stat1=00 devices=0x9 (ATAPI_SLAVE,ATA_MASTER> > > > old ata: > atapci0: <SiS 735 UDMA100 controller> port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0 > xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on pci0 > atapci0: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xff00 > ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 > atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x1f0 > atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x14 type 4 at 0x3f6 > ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=50 > ata0-master: stat=0x90 err=0x90 lsb=0x90 msb=0x90 > ata0-master: stat=0x90 err=0x90 lsb=0x90 msb=0x90 > ata0-master: stat=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 > ata0-slave: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb > ata0: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x9<ATAPI_SLAVE,ATA_MASTER> Hmm, from what I can see above both old and new find the exact same devices: ATAPI_SLAVE,ATA_MASTER. What is it you miss ? -- -SørenReceived on Tue Apr 05 2005 - 08:17:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC