On Tuesday 05 April 2005 12:44 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote: > On Apr 5, 2005 5:30 PM, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:35 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:22 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I noticed the following interrupt storm in my dmesg: > > > > > > > > Interrupt storm detected on "irq11: rl1"; throttling interrupt > > > > source Interrupt storm detected on "irq5: rl0"; throttling > > > > interrupt source > > > > > > > > Here is my vmstat -i: > > > > interrupt total rate > > > > irq0: clk 128600 199 > > > > irq1: atkbd0 2499 3 > > > > irq4: sio0 2 0 > > > > irq5: rl0 128901 200 > > > > irq8: rtc 82294 127 > > > > irq11: rl1 128902 200 > > > > irq12: psm0 16152 25 > > > > irq14: ata0 12600 19 > > > > irq15: ata1 71 0 > > > > Total 500021 776 > > > > > > > > and here is my dmesg: > > > > http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt > > > > > > > > I have options DEVICE_POLLING and options HZ=200, i have tested > > > > with greater HZ values like 1000, and without DEVICE_POLLING but i > > > > have the same storm. > > > > > > Try this: > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503161154.04555.jkim > > > > He's not using an APIC so that won't make any difference. > > If I use APIC, I will get "watchdog timeout" as i posted in an old email: > >rl0: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl0: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > >rl1: watchdog timeout > > Thanks, > Dan That's indicative of other interrupt routing problems. This is with APIC + ACPI, yes? If you disable ACPI, does APIC work or is it not found? Also, if you disable ACPI, does non-APIC work ok? -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Tue Apr 05 2005 - 16:24:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC