John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Ok, I see the issue now. The problem is that the BIOS sets the IRQ registers > in the PCI devices to values that don't match how the links are programmed > and we tend to trust the BIOS over the links in those cases. Can you tell me > what IRQ sk0 gets if you don't use ACPI? Does it get 5 or 9? If it gets 9, > does it work ok? > > You can try this patch for ACPI. Unfortunately, some BIOSes lie when you ask > a link which IRQ it is routed to, so I'm not sure if this patch can be > committed as is. Nate, do you know if such BIOSen only return no IRQ at all > (0 or 255) when they lie rather than a bogus "valid" IRQ? Without ACPI, sk0 gets irq 5 and it works ok. With your patch and ACPI, sk0 no longer timeouts, and it's usable. But I still have interrupt storms. dmesg: http://bsd.miki.eu.org/~antoine/current+acpi+patch.dmesg AntoineReceived on Tue Apr 05 2005 - 16:41:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC