In message <20050405201820.042685D07_at_ptavv.es.net>, "Kevin Oberman" writes: >> It would be useful if mount was smart enough to notice when it is >> dealing with a read-only device, and try to mount such things >> read-only, rather than trying to mount things read-write by default and >> failing. Of course, the system shouldn't panic, either. :-) > >I think that is what I said. I am almost sure that this is how it used >to work. I'm not sure whether the change was caused by something in >msdosfs or GEOM (or somewhere else), but I sure preferred it when the RO >device mounted RO. CDs still do this (thankfully). This makes me suspect >msdosfs is the culprit. There are two ways that a filesystem correctly could handle a R/O media: 1. Fail with EROFS unless asked t mouned read-only 2. Silently downgrade th emount to read-only. I personally prefer the first because that way a script does not have to check if it got the mount it wanted or not. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Tue Apr 05 2005 - 18:59:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC