Re: smbfs bug introduced at smbfs_vnops.c:1.58

Daniel Ellard wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Dimitry Andric wrote:
[ ... ]
> At least the gcc folk now do detect this old chestnut:
> 
> 	{
> 	    int a;
> 
> 	    a /= 0;
> 	}
> 
> which was used to provoke arguments in compiler
> classes for many years.  (Optimized, nothing happens.
> Unoptimized, a division-by-zero error happens...)

Great example.

If the optimized code fails to generate a division-by-zero error here, the 
optimizer is buggy.  (I won't quote Aho, Sethi, and Ullman again.... :-)

-- 
-Chuck