> >> >request that you use intmax_t rather than "long long" for the integers. > >> >Then the API scales cleanly when some future processor adds 128-bit ints. > >> >Since intmax_t is "long long" on all current platforms that wouldn't > >> >cause compatability problems with OpenBSD. > >> > >> I second that. Cc'd to OpenBSD-Tech. Comments? > > >If you must deal with octal and hex numbers, do it yourself. This is > >not the typical case, and we specially avoid handling them to keep > >this simple. > > You already said that, but what about using intmax_t as return type? No.Received on Tue Apr 12 2005 - 19:11:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:32 UTC