David Xu wrote: > Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>> >>>> On 2005-04-15 19:16, David Xu <davidxu_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I just checked what top does on SunOS, when a program has more than 999 >>>> threads and it seems to clip the number of threads to 999, as if >>>> something min(999, numthreads) is what is printed :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> you could proint " !!!" or "LOT" >>> or do a roman numeral approx. >>> e.g. MMC (2100).. what's roman for 10000? >>> or 2E4 :-) >> >> >> >> I realize that top isn't an exact science, but I find that >> approximations are generally a bad idea. I am in favor of axing the >> useless CPU column and reclaiming some useful screen space for the >> others... :) >> >> Andy >> >> | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > >> | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ > > > > > CPU column is not very useful when displaying process and > thread count, if it is only useful if it is displaying individual > thread which is activated by 'H' key. > > David Xu CPU and thread count column could be shared [CPU] )[1] [2] [3] ...[99] could be CPUnum.. that implies 1 thread 2..9999 is a thread count when H mode is on, then we just show [CPUNUM] wnen not we show [CPUNUM] or threadcount.Received on Sat Apr 16 2005 - 18:55:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:32 UTC