On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:59, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I also have found that changing the polling interval to 150 is an > improvement. Half a second is just too long, IMHO. I also discovered > that with my system (P4M) that some settings can use substantially more > power than faster settings, so I have kludged an ugly hack to avoid > those settings. These changes make a significant difference in power > consumption. Can you elaborate on these? It may be worth adding a general algorithm to cull the frequency list powerd uses based on this info. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:32 UTC