> > But in general, it looks that a main problem with original adaptive > algorithm is that it is possible to decrease an effective cpu > frequency to an incredibly small values (for mine centrino it can go > from 1.3Ghz down to 75Mhz), where even the easiest things take a lot > of time, so it is forced to increase it. It looks that just limiting > the minimal frequency by a something like 200-300 Mhz should make the > original adaptive algorithm work much better. > agree! estctrl decreased speed only down to 600MHz which worked perfectly for me ... guess even 200MHz would be a bit to slow still .. seb -- "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." --- Antoine de St. Exupery, Wind, Sand, and Stars, 1939Received on Thu Apr 21 2005 - 04:38:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:32 UTC